Tuck-it-Away's Supreme Court appeal
From Neighborhood Retail Alliance:
Put simply, Sprayregen believes that the NY court erred in its application of the SC guidelines in the Kelo case-and he emphasizes in particular the bad faith and favoritism that we have discussed on this blog-with the collusion of the consultants being case one of a fix being in for the benefit of Columbia University. In the second instance, Sprayregen is directly challenging the total lack of due process in the eminent domain procedure laws of NYS-laws that afford the property owners zero due process to argue against the state's use of the eminent domain right.
In essence Sprayregen is arguing that the Columbia expansion-and the ESDC collusion in it-exhibit exactly the kind of private transfer that Judge Stevens said Kelo was designed to prevent.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Columbia University case appealed to U.S. Supreme Court
Posted by Willets Point United at 3:27 AM
Labels: eminent domain, Nick Sprayregen, norman siegel, supreme court